Writing can be used in any classroom and in any discipline to aid in learning. These activities have been proven to aid in comprehension, retention, and engagement in the college classroom. You do not need to be a writing teacher to use them. At the end, active reading strategies are also offered.
“Writing to learn” activities are typically:
What are the benefits of using writing to learn activities?
The benefits of “writing to learn” activities also include:
Here is a list of “writing to learn” activities to consider trying in your classroom:
The Recorder
Ask students to observe a video, experiment, film, or process and then record what they see. Both text and drawings are okay for this one.
The Discussion Starter
Give students a question to write about for a few minutes before launching into a discussion in class.
The Learning Log
At the end of class students might write briefly about a question such as:
Synthesis Practice
Have students identify a key theme in one or more texts and write about it.
Interpretation Practice
Consider using one or more of these questions to help students interpret information:
Reflective Writing
Dialogic Writing
Trace the Process
Either while doing something or after, have students record the steps in a process.
Pre-Test Warm Up
Have students offer one problem that could be used on an upcoming test. Ask them to include the solution.
Analysis Practice
Have students break a complex topic into parts. You can also have students explore just one component of a larger concept/text/idea.
Connect the Theory to the Real World
Have students apply a theory to a situation or problem in a real-world context.
Active reading is known as using writing to increase reading comprehension, engagement with a text, and retention of key concepts in the material. Active reading strategies are used to:
Other Ideas from the WAC Clearinghouse Website:
References:
Most of these activities come from “Writing to Learn Activities” on the WAC Clearinghouse.
Several key ideas came from “How To Create High-Impact Writing Assignments That Enhance Learning and Development and Reinvigorate WAC/WID Programs: What Almost 72,000 Undergraduates Taught Us” from Across the Disciplines by Paul Anderson, Miami University (Ohio), Chris M. Anson, North Carolina State University, Robert M. Gonyea, Indiana University Bloomington, and Charles Paine, University of New Mexico
Marzano, Robert J. “Writing to Learn.” Educational Leadership, vol. 69, no. 5, Feb. 2012, pp. 82–83. EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asn&AN=71100812&site=ehost-live.
Writing as a Learning Activity, edited by Perry Klein, et al., BRILL, 2014. ProQuest Ebook Central, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uaz/detail.action?docID=1688656.
How can you best give feedback? Consider these options:
What you might include on a rubric
Rubrics can be used to avoid repetition in your feedback. They usually address:
Consider adding a “resources” section
Are there certain resources you keep pointing out for students? For example, you may include a link to Purdue’s OWL for MLA or APA on your rubric as a resource. You might have a particular textbook chapter you wish to refer students to for content. You may have a particular database you want them to use. You can include final reminders on a rubric.
Rubric generators
http://rubistar.4teachers.org/index.php
These are just a couple.
You do NOT have to:
In addition to the rubric, consider summative feedback
Here’s an example for a course reflection submitted at the beginning of the course:
You have offered a clear narrative of your experiences with writing, discussing the challenges, strengths, and goals you have in an organized, detailed manner. You have provided examples that tie into this narrative. 1-2 were relevant visual elements. You have spent some time on the design and exceeded the 500 word requirement. The portfolio is a great start! You have made a nice beginning in this course!
Favorite line from your reflection:
As you can see, I have described the assignment and offered encouragement for meeting those requirements. I personalize it by choosing a favorite line from the reflection.
In text feedback
If you choose to do so, you can offer feedback in the paper itself. Some advice:
Rubric for Journals
1-4 points 5-7 points 8-10 points
Rubric for a paragraph
|
Beginner |
Basic |
Intermediate |
Advanced |
Topic sentence |
Topic sentence is unclear and/or not complete. |
Topic sentence is somewhat unclear or is not complete. |
Topic sentence is complete but could be more specific. |
Topic sentence is strong and clearly states the main idea. |
Body/supporting sentences |
Short or overuse of simple sentences. |
Overuse of simple sentences and/or vague details. May be lacking one of the three main points. |
Has all three main points, but the details are vague in places. |
Consistently clear, specific details used to support three main points. Creates interest through varied sentence structure. |
Transition words |
Few or none used. |
Few used. |
Mostly used in front of key points. |
Used in front of each key point. |
Punctuation, spelling, word choice |
Needs a lot of editing. |
Needs some editing. |
Has a few editing issues. |
May have a couple of editing issues. |
MLA format |
Not used or lots of mistakes with MLA format. |
Several mistakes with MLA format. |
Mostly perfect MLA format. |
Perfect MLA format. |
Concluding sentence |
No concluding sentence. |
Unclear or partial concluding sentence. |
Vague concluding sentence. |
Clear, strong concluding sentence that ties up the main idea effectively. |
Long Essay Rubric
|
Beginner |
Basic |
Intermediate |
Advanced |
Introduction |
Introduction is unclear and/or not complete. |
Introduction is somewhat unclear or is not complete. |
Introduction is complete but could be more specific or use more work to gain the reader’s interest. |
Introduction is strong and clearly states the main idea. It gains the reader’s interest. |
Thesis Statement |
Is missing, is posed as a question, is incomplete, or is not the right type for the paragraph’s purpose. |
May be incomplete or not the right type for the paragraph’s purpose. |
Is clear but could be more specific. |
Is clear, is a statement, is specific, and is the right kind of the type of essay being written. |
Body paragraphs |
Short or overuse of simple sentences in most of the three body paragraphs. |
Overuse of simple sentences and/or vague details. May be lacking one of the three main points or short a body paragraph. |
Has all three main points, but the details are vague in places. |
Consistently clear, specific details used to support three main points. Creates interest through varied sentence structure. There are three clearly organized body paragraphs. |
Conclusion |
Is short, missing, or unclear. |
Is short or not developed nicely. |
Is not focused or does not effectively tie things together. |
Is clear, complete, focused, and ties everything together nicely. |
Transition words |
Few or none used. |
Few used. |
Mostly used in front of key points. |
Used in front of each key point. |
Punctuation, spelling, word choice |
Needs a lot of editing. |
Needs some editing. |
Has a few editing issues. |
May have a couple of editing issues. |
MLA format |
Not used or lots of mistakes with MLA format. |
Several mistakes with MLA format. |
Mostly perfect MLA format. |
Perfect MLA format. |
Concluding sentence |
No concluding sentence. |
Unclear or partial concluding sentence. |
Vague concluding sentence. |
Clear, strong concluding sentence that ties up the main idea effectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
Argumentative Research Paper Summative Feedback
Essay One Feedback
The first essay for this class gave you a chance to put what you learned about recognizing and analyzing arguments into practice. You were to write a good thesis that clearly stated your focused topic and your opinion on a controversial social or political issue. If you are still confused about what a thesis is, visit this website.
This thesis was to come at the end of an engaging introduction. We visited this website to learn about techniques for how to write a good introduction.
This was followed by two background paragraphs where you could demonstrate your ability to correctly cite quoted and paraphrased information. When you have two or more sentences from the same source that you put in your own words (paraphrased), then you can either:
For help with the basics of internal citations, visit this website.
After that, you had three paragraphs that began with a topic sentence that clearly stated one reason to agree with your position on the controversial topic that you stated in the thesis. This is called a “point” in a PIE paragraph. For a review with examples of the basics of writing a good paragraph, visit this website. For more information or examples on writing a PIE paragraph, visit this website.
In each body paragraph, you were to use at least one of the three required secondary sources to support your point. This information from a source might provide evidence for your claims or offer opinions from experts or give facts that support your claim. Anything from a source, quoted or paraphrased, must be cited using a set of parentheses at the end of each sentence from that source that contains the author’s last name. This is the “illustration” in a PIE paragraph.
In each body paragraph, you needed to write a couple of sentences or your own. You could have explained how the evidence supported the point. You could have elaborated on the evidence given from the sources. You could have made connections between the point of the paragraph and the evidence from sources clear.
Each of these three paragraphs should have been at least five sentences long, just as is required for every paragraph in the research paper.
After these three paragraphs that focus on reasons to support your argument, you were to write a paragraph addressing one strong opposing argument and then refute that argument. You were to use at least one secondary source.
You were to complete your essay with a strong conclusion. We visited this website for techniques on how to do that.
Other aspects of this paper that were important included:
Part of this paper required you to write a rough draft, get feedback from me in a conference on the paper, and then revise and edit a final draft of the paper. I encouraged you to look up any editing concerns using Purdue’s OWL. For example, if I have commented that you have a problem with comma splices, visit the website and put “comma splice” in the search box to find information and examples of how to fix that error.
Part of the paper was to find, evaluate, and use at least three secondary sources, but no more than five. One had to be a scholarly article. One had to be a current news article. The other type of source was up to you, so long as it met our criteria in terms of how old it was and was created by someone who was an expert on the topic you were researching.
What you did well:
Rubric for a Visual Analysis Essay
Rubric:
Content and Organization: Is the purpose of the analysis clear? Is the visual included and cited properly? Is it described in clear, precise detail? Did the writer discuss how the visual's message is part of a larger conversation or controversy? Does the writer discuss how the parts of the visual work together to create a particular message? Are secondary sources used to bring out important parts of the context or message? Does the writer cover important aspects of the context? Does the writer clearly communicate evidence drawn from a close analysis of the visual?
Are paragraphs focused on the visual? Are sources used to help offer good information, contexts, or insights? Is there an engaging introduction and a clear thesis? Is there a strong conclusion? ___ out of 75 points
Grammar, spelling, punctuation, diction, style: ___out of 10 points
MLA format: ____out of 15 points